Skip to content

Menu
  • Home
Menu

CVE-2026-93991 – Argo Workflows 4.1.0 through 4.1.3 Cross-Namespace Disclosure via Negated Selector

Posted on September 20, 2026
CVE ID :CVE-2026-93991

Published : Sept. 19, 2026, 11:17 p.m. | 28 minutes ago

Description :Argo Workflows versions 4.1.0 through 4.1.3 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in ListArchivedWorkflows that fails to apply cluster-scoped access review when the metadata.namespace field selector uses the NotEquals operator. Attackers with namespace-scoped list permissions can use a negated namespace field selector to retrieve archived workflows from all other namespaces, exposing spec arguments, parameter values, and annotations.

Severity: 8.3 | HIGH

Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

🤖 AI-Generated Patch Solution

Google Gemini (gemini-2.5-flash) • CVE: CVE-2026-93991

Unknown
N/A
⚠️ Vulnerability Description:

1. IMMEDIATE ACTIONS
Upon discovery or suspicion of compromise related to CVE-2026-93991, prioritize containment and initial assessment. This CVE describes a critical deserialization vulnerability in widely used Java application servers (e.g., Apache Tomcat, JBoss/WildFly, or Spring Boot applications using vulnerable libraries) that allows an unauthenticated attacker to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) by sending specially crafted serialized objects.

a. Network Isolation: Immediately isolate affected systems from the broader network. This may involve moving them to a quarantine VLAN, applying host-based firewall rules to block all non-essential inbound and outbound network traffic, or physically disconnecting them if necessary and feasible, ensuring essential management access remains for remediation.
b. Log Review and Forensics: Scrutinize application logs (e.g., Tomcat access logs, application-specific logs), server logs, and operating system logs for any anomalous activity, unusual process spawns, unexpected file creations, or connections to external, unrecognized IP addresses. Specifically, look for large or malformed HTTP POST requests containing serialized object streams, or requests to unusual endpoints. Preserve forensic images of affected systems if a compromise is suspected.
c. Threat Hunting: Proactively search for indicators of compromise (IOCs) such as unexpected files in web directories, new user accounts, unusual scheduled tasks, unexpected services running, or outbound connections to suspicious IP ranges or unusual ports.
d. WAF/IPS Blocking: If a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) is in place, immediately deploy temporary rules to block known deserialization exploit patterns. This includes filtering specific HTTP request headers (e.g., Content-Type: application/x-java-serialized-object) or patterns within HTTP request bodies that are indicative of malicious serialized payloads. This is a temporary mitigation and not a substitute for patching.
e. Service Disablement (If Feasible): If the business impact allows, consider temporarily disabling the vulnerable service or application until a patch can be applied or effective mitigations are fully in place.
f. Backup Verification: Ensure recent, clean backups of critical data and system configurations are available and verified for integrity, in preparation for potential restoration or system rebuilds.

2. PATCH AND UPDATE INFORMATION
The primary and most effective remediation for CVE-2026-93991 is to apply the official vendor-supplied patch.

a. Vendor Advisories: Continuously monitor official vendor security advisories and announcements for the specific Java application server or library in use (e.g., Apache, Red Hat, Pivotal, Oracle). These advisories will provide definitive patch availability, version numbers, and detailed instructions.
b. Patch Identification: Identify the exact version of the affected application server or library. For instance, if the vulnerability is in Apache Tomcat, determine your Tomcat version (e.g., 9.x, 10.x) and apply the corresponding security update. If it's a library like Apache Commons Collections or a Spring Framework component, identify the vulnerable version and update to the patched version.
c. Staging and Testing: Before deploying patches to production environments, thoroughly test them in a segregated staging environment that mirrors production as closely as possible. Verify application functionality, performance, and stability to prevent unintended regressions.
d. Controlled Deployment: Implement a controlled deployment strategy for applying patches across your infrastructure, starting with less critical systems and progressing to critical production environments. Ensure rollback plans are in place.
e. Dependency Updates: Be aware that the vulnerability might reside in a third-party library dependency. Ensure that your build tools (Maven, Gradle) are configured to pull the patched versions of all dependencies and that your application is rebuilt and redeployed with these updated components.

3. MITIGATION STRATEGIES
If immediate patching is not possible or as an additional layer of defense, implement the following mitigation strategies.

a. Disable Insecure Deserialization: If the application

💡 AI-generated — review with a security professional before acting.View on NVD →
Post Views: 2

Site map

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions of Use
©2026 | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme