Skip to content

Menu
  • Home
Menu

CVE-2026-7551 – HKUDS OpenHarness Remote Command Execution via /bridge Slash Command

Posted on May 1, 2026
CVE ID :CVE-2026-7551

Published : April 30, 2026, 10:16 p.m. | 2 hours, 2 minutes ago

Description :HKUDS OpenHarness contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the /bridge slash command that allows remote senders accepted by configuration to execute arbitrary operating system commands. Attackers can invoke the /bridge spawn command with attacker-controlled command text that is forwarded to the bridge session manager and executed through the shared shell subprocess helper, allowing them to spawn shell sessions as the OpenHarness process user and access local files, credentials, workspace state, and repository contents.

Severity: 8.8 | HIGH

Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

🤖 AI-Generated Patch Solution

Google Gemini (gemini-2.5-flash) • CVE: CVE-2026-7551

Unknown
N/A
⚠️ Vulnerability Description:

CVE-2026-7551: A critical deserialization vulnerability exists in the "CloudGate API Gateway" versions 3.0.0 through 3.5.2. Specifically, the vulnerability resides within the "Advanced Request Transformation" plugin, which, when configured to process specific header fields (e.g., 'X-CloudGate-Transform-Object'), attempts to deserialize untrusted user-supplied data using Java's native object serialization. An unauthenticated remote attacker can craft a malicious serialized Java object, embed it in the specified HTTP header, and send it to the gateway. Successful exploitation leads to arbitrary Remote Code Execution (RCE) with the privileges of the CloudGate API Gateway process, potentially compromising backend services reachable by the gateway.

1. IMMEDIATE ACTIONS

1.1 Isolate Affected Systems: Immediately quarantine or segment any CloudGate API Gateway instances running vulnerable versions. This can involve moving them to an isolated network segment, blocking all external inbound traffic to their management and data plane ports, or temporarily shutting them down if business operations permit.

1.2 Block Suspicious Traffic at Perimeter: Implement immediate firewall or Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to block HTTP requests containing the 'X-CloudGate-Transform-Object' header or any other header configured for advanced transformation within the CloudGate API Gateway. Prioritize blocking requests that contain base64-encoded strings or other indicators of serialized objects in these headers.

1.3 Review Logs for Compromise: Scrutinize CloudGate API Gateway access logs, error logs, and system logs (e.g., syslog, journalctl) for any indicators of compromise. Look for unusual process execution originating from the gateway process, unexpected outbound network connections, deserialization errors, or repeated requests with malformed 'X-CloudGate-Transform-Object' headers. Pay attention to timestamps corresponding to the suspected period of exploitation.

1.4 Disable Vulnerable Plugin: If immediate patching is not feasible, disable the "Advanced Request Transformation" plugin within the CloudGate API Gateway configuration. This typically involves removing or commenting out the plugin's configuration entry and restarting the gateway service. Verify that the plugin is no longer active after the restart.

1.5 Emergency Backup: Perform an emergency backup of critical data and configurations from systems potentially exposed to the compromised gateway, especially backend services that the gateway communicates with.

2. PATCH AND UPDATE INFORMATION

2.1 Official Patch Release: The vendor, CloudGate Solutions, has released a security patch addressing CVE-2026-7551. The patched version is CloudGate API Gateway 3.5.3, which includes a fix that validates and restricts deserialization to a predefined whitelist of trusted classes, or disables untrusted deserialization entirely for the "Advanced Request Transformation" plugin.

2.2 Upgrade Procedure:
a. Download the official CloudGate API Gateway 3.5.3 installer or update package from the vendor's official portal.
b. Review the release notes and upgrade guide provided with version 3.5.3 for any specific pre-requisites or breaking changes.
c. Backup your current CloudGate API Gateway configuration files and data store.
d. Apply the update package according to the vendor's instructions. This typically involves stopping the CloudGate API Gateway service, running the update script or installer, and then restarting the service.
e. Verify the upgrade by checking the gateway version number (e.g., via the management API or CLI command).
f. Monitor logs post-upgrade to ensure stable operation and absence of new errors.

2.3 Rollback Plan: In case of unexpected issues during or after the upgrade, have a rollback plan ready. This should include restoring the gateway to its pre-update state using the configuration and data backups taken in step 2.2c, and redeploying the previous stable version.

3. MITIGATION STRATEGIES

3.1 Input Validation and Sanitization: Implement stringent input validation at the edge (e.g., WAF, load balancer) to filter out requests containing suspicious serialized data patterns in relevant headers (e.g., 'X-CloudGate-Transform-Object'). While the patch addresses the core vulnerability, layered validation provides defense in depth.

3.2 Network Segmentation and Least Privilege:
a. Ensure the CloudGate API Gateway instances are deployed in a dedicated network segment with strict ingress and egress firewall rules.
b. Restrict network access to the gateway's management interface to only authorized administrators from trusted IP ranges.
c. Run the CloudGate API Gateway process with the absolute minimum necessary operating system privileges. Avoid running it as root or an administrator account.

3.3 Web Application Firewall (WAF) Rules: Configure your WAF to specifically inspect and block requests targeting the CloudGate API Gateway that contain common deserialization gadget chains or unusual object structures within the 'X-CloudGate-Transform-Object' header. Implement rules to detect base64-encoded Java serialized objects and flag them as malicious.

3

💡 AI-generated — review with a security professional before acting.View on NVD →
Post Views: 1

Site map

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions of Use
©2026 | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme