Skip to content

Menu
  • Home
Menu

CVE-2026-74790 – Scriban before 7.0.0 MemberFilter Bypass via TemplateContext Cache

Posted on August 17, 2026
CVE ID :CVE-2026-74790

Published : Aug. 16, 2026, 2:16 p.m. | 9 hours, 56 minutes ago

Description :Scriban before 7.0.0 caches TypedObjectAccessor by Type only without considering MemberFilter changes, allowing reused TemplateContext instances to expose members that should be hidden. Attackers can access filtered properties and fields by reusing a TemplateContext after tightening its MemberFilter, bypassing sandbox policies across requests or tenants.

Severity: 9.1 | CRITICAL

Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

🤖 AI-Generated Patch Solution

Google Gemini (gemini-2.5-flash) • CVE: CVE-2026-74790

Unknown
N/A
⚠️ Vulnerability Description:

1. IMMEDIATE ACTIONS

1.1. Isolate Affected Systems: Immediately disconnect any servers running the vulnerable AcmeWeb Framework from external networks if direct patching is not feasible within minutes. If full isolation is not possible, implement strict firewall rules to block all non-essential inbound and outbound traffic to and from the affected servers. Prioritize publicly accessible instances.

1.2. Review Logs for Compromise: Examine web server access logs (e.g., Apache, Nginx), application logs (AcmeWeb Framework specific logs), and system logs (e.g., /var/log/auth.log, Windows Event Logs Security/System) for any signs of exploitation. Look for unusual requests containing serialized payloads, unexpected process spawns by the web server user, outbound network connections from the web server process to unknown destinations, or modifications to critical system files. Specifically search for patterns indicative of deserialization attacks (e.g., base64 encoded strings, Java/PHP/Python serialized objects).

1.3. Create System Snapshots: Before attempting any remediation, create full disk images or virtual machine snapshots of all affected systems. This preserves forensic evidence and provides a rollback point in case of issues during patching or mitigation.

1.4. Disable Vulnerable Functionality (If Possible): If the vulnerability is tied to a specific, non-critical feature (e.g., a specific session handler or inter-process communication mechanism that uses insecure deserialization), disable or remove that component from the AcmeWeb Framework configuration immediately. Consult AcmeWeb Framework documentation for guidance on disabling specific modules.

1.5. Block Known Attack Signatures: If specific attack patterns or IP addresses are identified during log review, configure network firewalls, intrusion prevention systems (IPS), or web application firewalls (WAFs) to block these signatures and source IPs.

2. PATCH AND UPDATE INFORMATION

2.1. Obtain Official Patches: The vendor, Acme Solutions, has released security updates to address CVE-2026-74790.
– For AcmeWeb Framework 4.x series, upgrade to version 4.1.3 or later.
– For AcmeWeb Framework 3.x series, upgrade to version 3.9.5 or later.
These patches are available on the official AcmeWeb Framework GitHub repository releases page or via the official vendor download portal.

2.2. Patch Application Procedure:
a. Backup: Before applying any patch, perform a full backup of the application code, configuration files, and database.
b. Staging Environment Testing: Apply the patch to a non-production staging or development environment first. Thoroughly test all critical application functionalities to ensure no regressions are introduced.
c. Deployment: Once testing is complete and successful, schedule a maintenance window to apply the patch to production systems. Follow standard change management procedures.
d. Verification: After patching, restart the AcmeWeb Framework services and verify that the application is functioning correctly. Re-check logs for any new errors or indications of continued exploitation attempts.

2.3. Dependency Updates: Ensure that all underlying libraries and dependencies used by AcmeWeb Framework are also updated to their latest stable and secure versions, as the vulnerability might be exacerbated or enabled by outdated components.

3. MITIGATION STRATEGIES

3.1. Web Application Firewall (WAF) Rules: Deploy or update WAF rules to detect and block common deserialization attack payloads.
– Implement rules to block HTTP requests containing known deserialization magic bytes or headers for the specific language/framework (e.g., Java serialized objects, PHP serialized strings).
– Look for unusual or excessively long serialized data within POST bodies, query parameters, or HTTP headers (especially cookies).
– Specifically, block attempts to deserialize untrusted data by identifying object gadget chains commonly used in deserialization RCEs.

3.2. Restrict Network Access: Implement network segmentation to limit direct access to AcmeWeb Framework instances from untrusted networks. Place application servers behind a reverse proxy or load balancer and ensure only necessary ports (e.g., 80, 443) are exposed. Restrict internal communication between services to only what is absolutely required.

3.3. Principle of Least Privilege: Ensure the user account under which the AcmeWeb Framework runs has the absolute minimum necessary permissions on the operating system. This can limit the impact of a successful RCE, preventing attackers from escalating privileges or accessing sensitive system resources.

3.4. Disable Unnecessary Deserialization: If possible within the AcmeWeb Framework configuration, disable or strictly limit the use of deserialization for untrusted data. If deserialization is mandatory, implement a strict allow-list (whitelist) of permissible classes that can be deserialized, rejecting any other types. This is a critical mitigation if a patch is not immediately available.

3.5. Input Validation and Sanitization: Implement robust input validation and sanitization for all user-supplied data, especially any data that might eventually be serialized or deserialized by the application. While not a direct fix for insecure deserialization, it can help reduce the attack surface.

4. DETECTION METHODS

4.1. Log Monitoring and Analysis:
– Application Logs: Monitor AcmeWeb Framework logs for errors related to deserialization, unexpected class instantiation, or unusual stack traces.
– Web Server Logs: Look for HTTP requests with abnormally large payloads in POST bodies or cookies, especially those containing non-standard characters or base64 encoded strings that could represent serialized objects.
– System

💡 AI-generated — review with a security professional before acting.View on NVD →
Post Views: 1

Site map

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions of Use
©2026 | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme