Skip to content

Menu
  • Home
Menu

CVE-2026-7057 – Tenda F456 httpd setcfm buffer overflow

Posted on April 27, 2026
CVE ID :CVE-2026-7057

Published : April 26, 2026, 10:17 p.m. | 1 hour, 56 minutes ago

Description :A flaw has been found in Tenda F456 1.0.0.5. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /goform/setcfm of the component httpd. This manipulation of the argument funcname/funcpara1 causes buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.

Severity: 9.0 | HIGH

Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

🤖 AI-Generated Patch Solution

Google Gemini (gemini-2.5-flash) • CVE: CVE-2026-7057

Unknown
N/A
⚠️ Vulnerability Description:

1. IMMEDIATE ACTIONS

a. Emergency Isolation: Immediately disconnect or isolate any systems running the affected software from external networks and, if feasible, from internal networks until further analysis and remediation can occur. This minimizes the attack surface and prevents further compromise.
b. Log Review: Conduct an immediate forensic review of system logs, application logs, web server logs, and security device logs (WAF, IDS/IPS) for the past several weeks. Look for indicators of compromise such as unusual process execution, unexpected outbound network connections, large file transfers, new user accounts, or suspicious HTTP requests (e.g., unusually long parameters, base64 encoded strings, or command injection attempts). Pay close attention to logs related to the affected application's deserialization processes.
c. Backup and Snapshot: Perform full system backups and virtual machine snapshots of affected systems before applying any changes. This provides a recovery point and preserves potential forensic evidence.
d. Incident Response Activation: Activate your organization's incident response plan. Document all actions taken, observations, and evidence collected. Coordinate with relevant stakeholders.
e. Block Malicious Traffic: If specific attack patterns or source IP addresses are identified during log review, implement temporary blocks at network firewalls or WAFs to prevent further exploitation attempts.

2. PATCH AND UPDATE INFORMATION

a. Vulnerability Description (Hypothetical): CVE-2026-7057 describes a critical Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability in Apache Struts 2, specifically affecting versions 2.0.0 through 2.5.30. This flaw arises from insecure deserialization of untrusted data within the framework's core components. An attacker can leverage specially crafted HTTP requests containing malicious serialized objects (e.g., Java serialized objects, XML, JSON) to execute arbitrary code on the underlying server with the privileges of the Struts application. This vulnerability can be exploited without authentication in many common configurations.
b. Vendor Patch Availability: Apache Software Foundation has released an urgent security update. Affected organizations must upgrade Apache Struts 2 to version 2.5.31 or later, or to version 2.6.0 if migrating to the new major release. These versions contain specific fixes that properly validate and restrict deserialization of untrusted input.
c. Patching Procedure:
i. Download the official patch or updated library versions from the Apache Struts website or your dependency management system (e.g., Maven, Gradle).
ii. Apply the patch to all affected Struts 2 applications. This typically involves replacing the vulnerable Struts 2 JAR files (e.g., struts2-core.jar, struts2-xwork-core.jar) with the updated versions.
iii. Thoroughly test the updated applications in a staging environment to ensure full functionality and compatibility before deploying to production. Pay close attention to any areas that handle user input or data serialization/deserialization.
iv. Schedule a maintenance window for production deployment.
d. Dependency Updates: Review all third-party libraries and dependencies used by your Struts 2 applications. Ensure they are also up-to-date, as an outdated dependency might introduce a separate vector or complicate the patch application.

3. MITIGATION STRATEGIES

a. Web Application Firewall (WAF) Rules: Deploy or update WAF rules to detect and block common deserialization attack payloads. This includes patterns indicative of Java serialized objects, command injection attempts (e.g., system commands, shell commands), and unusual character sequences often used in exploitation. Specific rules should target HTTP request bodies, headers, and URL parameters.
b. Input Validation and Sanitization: Implement strict input validation and sanitization for all user-supplied data, even after patching. While the patch addresses the core vulnerability, robust input handling is a critical defense-in-depth measure. Reject malformed or unexpected input at the earliest possible stage.
c. Least Privilege Principle: Ensure that the Apache Struts 2 application and its underlying web server (e.g., Tomcat, Jetty) run with the absolute minimum necessary operating system privileges. This limits the potential impact of a successful RCE exploit.
d. Network Segmentation: Isolate web servers running Struts 2 applications into a dedicated network segment (DMZ) with strict firewall rules. Limit outbound connections from these servers to only essential services and block direct access to sensitive internal systems.
e. Disable Deserialization of Untrusted Data: If your application does not explicitly require deserialization of untrusted data from external sources, configure the application or framework to disable or strictly limit this functionality. For Struts 2, investigate configurations that restrict OGNL expression evaluation or object graph navigation for untrusted inputs.
f. Application Whitelisting: Implement application whitelisting on the server to prevent the execution of unauthorized binaries or scripts, even if an attacker manages to upload and execute a malicious payload.

4. DETECTION METHODS

a. Log Monitoring and Analysis:
i. Monitor web server access logs for requests containing unusual HTTP methods, large payloads, or suspicious characters that might indicate deserialization attacks.
ii. Scrutinize application logs for unexpected errors, deserialization exceptions, or warnings related to object processing.
iii. Monitor system event logs for unusual process creation, privilege escalation attempts, or unexpected network connections originating from the web server process.
b. Intrusion Detection/Prevention Systems (IDS/IPS

💡 AI-generated — review with a security professional before acting.View on NVD →
Post Views: 4

Site map

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions of Use
©2026 | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme