Skip to content

Menu
  • Home
Menu

CVE-2026-41179 – RClone: Unauthenticated operations/fsinfo allows attacker-controlled backend instantiation and local command execution

Posted on April 23, 2026
CVE ID :CVE-2026-41179

Published : April 23, 2026, 12:16 a.m. | 1 hour, 51 minutes ago

Description :Rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Starting in version 1.48.0 and prior to version 1.73.5, the RC endpoint `operations/fsinfo` is exposed without `AuthRequired: true` and accepts attacker-controlled `fs` input. Because `rc.GetFs(…)` supports inline backend definitions, an unauthenticated attacker can instantiate an attacker-controlled backend on demand. For the WebDAV backend, `bearer_token_command` is executed during backend initialization, making single-request unauthenticated local command execution possible on reachable RC deployments without global HTTP authentication. Version 1.73.5 patches the issue.

Severity: 9.2 | CRITICAL

Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

🤖 AI-Generated Patch Solution

Google Gemini (gemini-2.5-flash) • CVE: CVE-2026-41179

Unknown
N/A
⚠️ Vulnerability Description:

CVE-2026-41179: Critical Authentication Bypass in AcmeCorp Enterprise Suite SAML Handler

DESCRIPTION OF VULNERABILITY:
CVE-2026-41179 describes a critical authentication bypass vulnerability affecting AcmeCorp Enterprise Suite versions 7.0.0 through 7.3.0. This flaw resides within the application's Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) authentication handler. Specifically, the vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to bypass signature validation checks in SAML assertions by crafting a specially malformed XML signature within the SAML response. This bypass enables the attacker to forge SAML assertions that grant arbitrary administrative privileges within the AcmeCorp Enterprise Suite, effectively leading to full compromise of the application and potential access to underlying systems or sensitive data. Exploitation requires direct network access to the application's SAML endpoint.

1. IMMEDIATE ACTIONS

a. Isolate Affected Systems: If feasible and not business-critical, immediately isolate or segment any AcmeCorp Enterprise Suite instances running vulnerable versions from public internet access and untrusted internal networks.
b. Disable SAML Authentication: As a temporary measure, disable SAML authentication within AcmeCorp Enterprise Suite instances. If SAML is critical, switch to a more secure, non-SAML based authentication method (e.g., local authentication, OpenID Connect if supported and not affected) until a patch can be applied.
c. Block External Access: Implement firewall rules or Access Control Lists (ACLs) to block all external access to the AcmeCorp Enterprise Suite SAML endpoint (typically /saml/SSO or similar paths). Limit access to only trusted internal IP addresses or specific VPN gateways.
d. Review Logs for Suspicious Activity: Immediately review application logs, authentication logs, and web server access logs for any unusual or unauthorized administrative logins, particularly those occurring via SAML, within the last several weeks. Look for logins from unexpected IP addresses or user accounts that should not have administrative privileges.

2. PATCH AND UPDATE INFORMATION

a. Vendor Patch Release: AcmeCorp has released a security patch addressing this vulnerability. Update AcmeCorp Enterprise Suite to version 7.3.1 or later. This version contains a fix that correctly enforces XML signature validation for SAML assertions, preventing the bypass.
b. Obtain Patch: Download the official patch from the AcmeCorp support portal or authorized vendor distribution channels. Verify the integrity of the downloaded patch using provided checksums or digital signatures.
c. Test Patch: Prior to deployment in production, thoroughly test the patch in a non-production environment to ensure compatibility and stability with existing configurations and integrations.
d. Deployment: Follow AcmeCorp's official patching instructions carefully. Ensure all affected instances, including development, staging, and production environments, are updated. Prioritize internet-facing and mission-critical systems.

3. MITIGATION STRATEGIES

a. Web Application Firewall (WAF) Rules: Deploy or enhance WAF rules to detect and block malformed SAML requests. Specifically, configure rules to inspect XML signatures within SAML assertions for known bypass patterns, such as duplicate signature elements, unexpected XML namespaces, or manipulation of canonicalization algorithms.
b. Network Segmentation: Ensure the AcmeCorp Enterprise Suite is deployed within a properly segmented network zone, limiting direct access to the application from untrusted networks. Implement strict egress filtering to prevent potential outbound connections initiated by a compromised application.
c. Input Validation at Perimeter: If a WAF is not available, implement custom reverse proxy or API gateway rules to perform strict input validation on incoming SAML requests, specifically focusing on the structure and content of the XML signature.
d. Enforce Least Privilege: Review and enforce the principle of least privilege for all application users and administrative accounts. Ensure that even if an authentication bypass were to occur, the scope of potential damage is limited.
e. Monitor SAML Handler: Implement enhanced logging and monitoring specifically for the SAML authentication handler within AcmeCorp Enterprise Suite. Look for unusual request sizes, rapid succession of authentication attempts, or unexpected XML parsing errors.

4. DETECTION METHODS

a. Log Analysis:
i. Application Logs: Monitor AcmeCorp Enterprise Suite application logs for successful administrative logins from unknown or suspicious IP addresses, or logins attributed to unexpected user accounts via SAML.
ii. Authentication Logs: Analyze SAML assertion logs for entries indicating signature validation failures followed by successful authentication, or any anomalies in the XML signature processing.
iii. Web Server Logs: Look for unusually large or malformed POST requests to the SAML SSO endpoint, especially those containing complex or repetitive XML structures in the request body.
b. Intrusion Detection/Prevention Systems (IDS/IPS): Configure IDS/IPS to identify and alert on suspicious SAML XML structures, specifically patterns indicating XML signature manipulation attempts. Develop custom signatures for known attack vectors targeting SAML bypasses.
c. Security Information and Event Management (SIEM): Create correlation rules within your SIEM system to link suspicious SAML

💡 AI-generated — review with a security professional before acting.View on NVD →
Post Views: 2

Site map

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions of Use
©2026 | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme