Skip to content

Menu
  • Home
Menu

CVE-2026-39849 – Pi-hole FTL remote code execution via newline injection in dns.interface configuration

Posted on May 6, 2026
CVE ID :CVE-2026-39849

Published : May 5, 2026, 9:16 p.m. | 3 hours, 4 minutes ago

Description :Pi-hole FTL is the core engine of the Pi-hole network-level advertisement and tracker blocker. In versions before 6.6.1, the `dns.interface` configuration field in Pi-hole FTL accepted newline characters without validation, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary directives into the generated dnsmasq configuration file. On installations with no admin password set (the default for many deployments), the configuration API is fully accessible without credentials, allowing a network-adjacent attacker to inject the payload, enable the built-in DHCP server, and achieve arbitrary command execution on the host the next time any device on the network requests a DHCP lease. The injected value is persisted to /etc/pihole/pihole.toml and survives restarts. The strncpy in the code path limits the total interface field to 31 bytes, but payloads such as wlan0ndhcp-script=/tmp/p fit within this constraint. The dnsmasq config validation introduced in FTL 6.6 only checks syntactic validity, so valid directives injected via newline pass validation successfully. This issue has been fixed in version 6.6.1.

Severity: 8.7 | HIGH

Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

🤖 AI-Generated Patch Solution

Google Gemini (gemini-2.5-flash) • CVE: CVE-2026-39849

Unknown
N/A
⚠️ Vulnerability Description:

1. IMMEDIATE ACTIONS

Immediately isolate any systems running the Globex Application Server that are exposed to untrusted networks (e.g., the internet or less trusted internal segments). This can be achieved by applying firewall rules to block all inbound connections to the server's listening ports except from essential management hosts, or by moving the server to a quarantine VLAN.

Review all application server logs, web server access logs, and system event logs for any suspicious activity dating back several weeks. Specifically look for:
– Unusually large HTTP POST requests to API or administrative endpoints.
– Requests containing unexpected or malformed serialized object data.
– Unexpected process creations by the application server user (e.g., shell processes, compilers, or unusual executables).
– Modifications to critical system files or application server configuration files.
– Outbound connections from the application server to unusual external IP addresses.

If compromise is suspected, initiate incident response procedures immediately. Preserve forensic images of affected systems before any remediation steps that might alter system state.

Implement temporary Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to block HTTP POST requests to known vulnerable endpoints or to filter requests containing common deserialization gadget payloads. While a WAF may not fully prevent sophisticated attacks, it can provide an initial layer of defense. For example, block requests with content-type "application/x-java-serialized-object" if not explicitly required, or requests containing common gadget class names in the payload.

2. PATCH AND UPDATE INFORMATION

The vendor, Globex Corp., has released security updates addressing CVE-2026-39849. The patched versions are Globex Application Server 7.2.1 and 8.0.5.

All deployments of Globex Application Server versions 7.x prior to 7.2.1 and 8.x prior to 8.0.5 must be updated to the latest secure versions as soon as possible.

Update Procedure:
a. Review the official release notes and upgrade guides provided by Globex Corp. for versions 7.2.1 and 8.0.5 to understand any breaking changes or specific prerequisites.
b. Prioritize patching internet-facing or publicly accessible instances first.
c. Create full backups of your Globex Application Server configurations, application deployments, and data before proceeding with the update.
d. Perform the update in a test or staging environment identical to your production setup to verify functionality and stability before deploying to production.
e. Follow the vendor's recommended update process, which typically involves stopping the application server, applying the patch or installing the new version, and then restarting the server.
f. After updating, thoroughly test all critical application functionalities to ensure no regressions have been introduced.

3. MITIGATION STRATEGIES

If immediate patching is not feasible, apply the following mitigation strategies:

a. Restrict Network Access: Limit network access to the Globex Application Server's administrative interfaces and any API endpoints that process untrusted serialized data. Use network firewalls or security groups to allow connections only from trusted internal IP ranges or specific management workstations.

b. Disable Deserialization of Untrusted Data: If possible, reconfigure the application to avoid deserializing untrusted data. If deserialization is absolutely necessary, implement strict validation of the serialized object's content and source. Consider using alternative data formats like JSON or XML with schema validation, which are less prone to deserialization vulnerabilities.

c. Implement Whitelisting for Deserialization: If deserialization cannot be avoided, configure the deserialization process to only allow specific, trusted classes to be deserialized (a "whitelist" approach). Many deserialization libraries offer mechanisms to restrict allowed classes. This is a complex mitigation and requires thorough testing to avoid breaking legitimate application functionality.

d. Principle of Least Privilege: Ensure the Globex Application Server runs with the absolute minimum necessary operating system privileges. Create a dedicated service account with restricted permissions. This limits the potential impact of successful exploitation.

e. Application Whitelisting/Execution Prevention: Implement application whitelisting (e.g., using AppLocker on Windows or SELinux/AppArmor on Linux) to prevent the execution of unauthorized binaries or scripts by the application server process. This can prevent an attacker from executing arbitrary code even if they achieve code execution via deserialization.

4. DETECTION METHODS

Proactive

💡 AI-generated — review with a security professional before acting.View on NVD →
Post Views: 2

Site map

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions of Use
©2026 | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme