Published : Feb. 27, 2026, 12:16 a.m. | 33 minutes ago
Description : WebSocket endpoints lack proper authentication mechanisms, enabling
attackers to perform unauthorized station impersonation and manipulate
data sent to the backend. An unauthenticated attacker can connect to the
OCPP WebSocket endpoint using a known or discovered charging station
identifier, then issue or receive OCPP commands as a legitimate charger.
Given that no authentication is required, this can lead to privilege
escalation, unauthorized control of charging infrastructure, and
corruption of charging network data reported to the backend.
Severity: 9.4 | CRITICAL
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…
🤖 AI-Generated Patch Solution
Google Gemini (gemini-2.5-flash) • CVE: CVE-2026-27767
N/A
Description:
CVE-2026-27767 describes a critical Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability affecting AcmeCorp Application Server (AAS) versions 3.x prior to 3.5. This flaw allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on the server with the privileges of the AAS process. The vulnerability stems from improper input validation and deserialization of specially crafted data within a specific custom HTTP header, 'X-Acme-Processor-Header', when processed by the AAS core component. An attacker can send a malicious HTTP request containing a crafted payload in this header, leading to the execution of arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. This vulnerability impacts any instance of AAS 3.x, regardless of the applications deployed, if the vulnerable parsing component is active or accessible.
1. IMMEDIATE ACTIONS
a. Isolate Affected Systems: Immediately disconnect any AcmeCorp Application Server instances running vulnerable versions (AAS 3.x prior to 3.5) from external networks. If full isolation is not feasible, restrict network access to only essential, trusted internal hosts.
b. Block Malicious Traffic: Implement temporary perimeter firewall rules or Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to block all HTTP requests containing the 'X-Acme-Processor-Header' or any requests that exhibit suspicious patterns (e.g., unusual characters, command-like strings) in HTTP headers or body directed towards AAS instances.
c. Disable Vulnerable Functionality: If possible and business operations permit, temporarily disable any non-essential services or management interfaces of AAS that might directly process HTTP headers or input from untrusted sources. Consult AcmeCorp documentation for safe disabling procedures.
d. Review Logs for Exploitation: Scrutinize AAS access logs, application logs, and system event logs (e.g., Windows Event Log, Linux syslog) for any signs of exploitation attempts or successful compromise. Look for unusual process creations, outbound network connections from the AAS server, or unexpected file modifications.
e. Incident Response Activation: If signs of compromise are detected, activate your organization's incident response plan immediately. Preserve forensic evidence, contain the breach, and eradicate the threat.
2. PATCH AND UPDATE INFORMATION
a. Monitor Vendor Advisories: Regularly monitor the official AcmeCorp security advisories, product pages, and mailing lists for the release of security patches addressing CVE-2026-27767. As this is a future CVE, the patch is not yet available.
b. Prepare for Patch Deployment: Once AcmeCorp releases the patch (expected to be AAS version 3.5 or a specific hotfix for 3.x), prioritize its immediate deployment across all affected AAS instances.
c. Follow Vendor Instructions: Adhere strictly to AcmeCorp's official patching instructions. This typically involves downloading the patch package from the vendor's trusted portal, backing up existing configurations, applying the update, and verifying successful installation.
d. Test Patches in Staging: If feasible, test the patch in a non-production, staging environment to ensure compatibility and stability before deploying to production systems, especially for critical applications.
e. Automated Update Management: For environments with numerous AAS instances, prepare to use automated patch management tools to expedite and standardize the update process once the patch is released.
3. MITIGATION STRATEGIES
a. Network Segmentation: Implement robust network segmentation to restrict direct access to AAS instances from the internet or untrusted internal networks. Place AAS servers in a dedicated DMZ or isolated network segment.
b. Web Application Firewall (WAF) Deployment: Deploy a WAF in front of all internet-facing AAS instances. Configure the WAF with custom rules to specifically inspect and block requests containing the 'X-Acme-Processor-Header' or any suspicious patterns indicative of command injection or deserialization attacks.
c. Principle of Least Privilege: Ensure that the AcmeCorp Application Server process runs with the absolute minimum necessary operating system privileges. Avoid running AAS as root or administrator.
d. Disable Unnecessary Services/Features: Review and disable any AAS modules, components, or services that are not essential for business operations. Reducing the attack surface can limit potential exploitation vectors.
e. Input Validation at Application Layer: For custom applications deployed on AAS, ensure robust server-side input validation is implemented for all user-supplied data, even if it's expected to be handled by AAS itself. This provides a defense-in-depth layer.
f. Remove Default Credentials and Hardened Configuration: Change all default credentials for AAS management interfaces and deployed applications. Implement all recommended security hardening guidelines provided by AcmeCorp.
4. DETECTION METHODS
a. Log Monitoring and Analysis:
i. HTTP Access Logs: Monitor AAS HTTP access logs for requests containing the 'X-Acme-Processor-Header', especially if it includes unusual characters, base64 encoded strings, or command-like syntax (e.g., 'exec', 'system', 'cmd.exe', '/bin/bash').
ii. Application Logs: Review AAS application logs for error messages, warnings, or unexpected behavior that might indicate an attempted or successful exploit.
iii. System Logs: Monitor operating system logs (e.g., /var/log/messages, Windows Event Log Security/System) for unusual process creations, failed login attempts, or unexpected network connections originating from the AAS process.
b. Network Intrusion Detection/Prevention Systems (NIDS/NIPS): Deploy NIDS/NIPS with signatures capable of detecting patterns associated with this vulnerability. Custom signatures should be developed to flag requests containing suspicious payloads