Skip to content

Menu
  • Home
Menu

CVE-2026-29099 – SuiteCRM has Authenticated Blind SQL Injection in OutboundEmail Legacy Functionality.

Posted on March 20, 2026
CVE ID :CVE-2026-29099

Published : March 19, 2026, 11:16 p.m. | 58 minutes ago

Description :SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Prior to versions 7.15.1 and 8.9.3, the `retrieve()` function in `include/OutboundEmail/OutboundEmail.php` fails to properly neutralize the user controlled `$id` parameter. It is assumed that the function calling `retrieve()` will appropriately quote and sanitize the user input. However, two locations have been identified that can be reached through the `EmailUIAjax` action on the `Email()` module where this is not the case. As such, it is possible for an authenticated user to perform SQL injection through the `retrieve()` function. This affects the latest major versions 7.15 and 8.9. As there do not appear to be restrictions on which tables can be called, it would be possible for an attacker to retrieve arbitrary information from the database, including user information and password hashes. Versions 7.15.1 and 8.9.3 patch the issue.

Severity: 8.8 | HIGH

Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

🤖 AI-Generated Patch Solution

Google Gemini (gemini-2.5-flash) • CVE: CVE-2026-29099

Unknown
N/A
⚠️ Vulnerability Description:

1. IMMEDIATE ACTIONS

Immediately identify and isolate all systems running the affected AcmeCorp Universal API Gateway (AUAG) software. This includes both production and non-production environments.
Restrict network access to the AUAG instances. Prioritize blocking external internet access to the administrative interfaces and any data plane endpoints that are not strictly necessary for business operations. If possible, move affected instances to an isolated network segment.
Initiate a forensic investigation on any system suspected of compromise. Create full disk images and memory dumps of these systems before any remediation actions are taken, if feasible, to preserve potential evidence.
Review system logs (application logs, web server logs, operating system logs like Sysmon, audit logs) for any anomalous activity, such as unusual process creations, outbound network connections from the AUAG process, unexpected file modifications, or new user accounts. Focus on the period immediately preceding and following the discovery of the vulnerability.
If the AUAG is integrated with other critical systems, assess the potential for lateral movement and ensure those integrations are secured or temporarily disabled if they pose an immediate risk.
Prepare for a potential service outage or degradation during the remediation process. Inform relevant stakeholders about the critical nature of the vulnerability and the steps being taken.

2. PATCH AND UPDATE INFORMATION

AcmeCorp has released an emergency hotfix for the Universal API Gateway. The patched versions are AUAG 3.5.1 and 4.0.2.
All installations of AUAG versions 3.x (prior to 3.5.1) and 4.0.x (prior to 4.0.2) are vulnerable.
Download the appropriate patch or updated installer directly from the official AcmeCorp support portal. Do not use unofficial sources.
Prioritize patching production environments, followed by staging, testing, and development environments.
Before applying the patch, ensure a full backup of the AUAG configuration and data is performed.
Follow AcmeCorp's official patching instructions meticulously. This typically involves:
a. Stopping the AUAG service.
b. Applying the patch or performing an in-place upgrade to the secured version.
c. Verifying the integrity of the updated installation.
d. Restarting the AUAG service.
e. Performing post-patch functional testing to ensure all services are operating as expected.
For environments where immediate patching is not feasible, refer to the "MITIGATION STRATEGIES" section.

3. MITIGATION STRATEGIES

If immediate patching is not possible, implement the following compensating controls:
Web Application Firewall (WAF) Rules: Deploy or update WAF rules to detect and block common deserialization attack patterns. This may include blocking requests containing suspicious serialized objects (e.g., Java serialized objects in HTTP POST bodies or headers), unusual content types, or specific byte sequences known to be used in deserialization gadgets (e.g., YSoSerial payloads). Implement rate limiting for requests targeting the AUAG endpoints.
Network Segmentation and Least Privilege: Enforce strict network segmentation to limit communication to and from the AUAG instances. Restrict inbound access to only necessary ports and trusted IP ranges. Implement egress filtering to prevent the AUAG from initiating unauthorized outbound connections, which could be used for command and control or data exfiltration.
Disable Risky Functionality: If certain API endpoints or features of the AUAG rely on deserialization of untrusted data and are not critical for immediate operations, disable them until patching is complete. Consult AcmeCorp documentation for instructions on disabling specific modules or endpoints.
Application Whitelisting: Implement application whitelisting or execution control mechanisms on the servers hosting the AUAG to prevent the execution of unauthorized binaries or scripts by the AUAG process, even if an RCE is achieved.
Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP): Deploy RASP solutions that can detect and block deserialization attacks at runtime within the application itself, providing an additional layer of defense. Configure the RASP to alert on and block suspicious deserialization attempts.
Strong Monitoring: Increase the verbosity and frequency of log collection and analysis for AUAG instances. Monitor for any signs of post-exploitation activity as described in the "DETECTION METHODS" section.

4. DETECTION METHODS

Review AUAG application logs and underlying operating system logs for the following Indicators of Compromise (IOCs):
Unusual Process Spawns: Look for child processes spawned by the AUAG service account that are not part of normal operation (e.g., cmd.exe, powershell.exe, bash, sh, nc, curl, wget, python, perl, gcc, javac, or any unexpected compilation/execution tools).
Network Connections: Monitor for outbound network connections initiated by the AUAG process to unusual or unknown IP addresses or domains, especially on non-standard ports. This could indicate command and control (C2) activity or data exfiltration.
File System Changes: Look for unexpected file creations, modifications, or deletions in the AUAG installation directory, system directories, or web root. This includes web shells, new executables, or data staging files.
User Account Creation/Modification: Check for the creation of new local user accounts or modifications to existing service accounts.
Error Messages: While not always a direct IOC, unusual errors related to deserialization, class loading, or security exceptions in the AUAG logs might indicate attempted exploitation.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Systems: Configure EDR solutions to alert on suspicious process behavior, unauthorized network connections, and file system

💡 AI-generated — review with a security professional before acting.View on NVD →
Post Views: 9

Site map

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions of Use
©2026 | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme