Skip to content

Menu
  • Home
Menu

CVE-2026-77933 – DB-GPT through 0.8.2 Hardcoded MySQL Root Credentials in docker-compose Deployment

Posted on October 20, 2026
CVE ID :CVE-2026-77933

Published : Oct. 20, 2026, 1:17 a.m. | 48 minutes ago

Description :DB-GPT through 0.8.2 contains a hardcoded credentials vulnerability in its default docker-compose.yml that sets a static MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD and publishes port 3306 on all interfaces. Attackers reaching port 3306 or the shared dbgptnet network can authenticate as root@% to gain full database access including FILE and SUPER privileges.

Severity: 9.8 | CRITICAL

Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

🤖 AI-Generated Patch Solution

Google Gemini (gemini-2.5-flash) • CVE: CVE-2026-77933

Unknown
N/A
⚠️ Vulnerability Description:

CVE-2026-77933: Insecure Deserialization in PhoenixMQ Framework Message Processor

Vulnerability Description:
A critical insecure deserialization vulnerability has been identified in the PhoenixMQ framework, specifically within its MessageProcessor component (affecting versions 3.x prior to 3.2.1, and 4.x prior to 4.0.3). This flaw allows an unauthenticated attacker to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the server by submitting specially crafted messages to PhoenixMQ queues or topics. When these messages are processed by vulnerable MessageProcessor instances, the insecure deserialization method fails to adequately restrict the types of objects that can be instantiated, leading to the potential for gadget chain exploitation and arbitrary code execution in the context of the PhoenixMQ application.

1. IMMEDIATE ACTIONS

a. Isolate Affected Systems: If possible, immediately quarantine or isolate servers running vulnerable PhoenixMQ MessageProcessor instances from the broader network, especially from untrusted external access.
b. Restrict Network Access: Implement immediate firewall rules to block all external and untrusted internal network access to PhoenixMQ broker ports (e.g., 61616 for OpenWire, 5672 for AMQP, 8161 for admin console) on affected servers. Only allow essential, whitelisted IP addresses or subnets.
c. Review Logs for Compromise: Scrutinize PhoenixMQ application logs, system logs (e.g., syslog, Windows Event Logs), and security logs for any unusual activity, such as unexpected process spawns, outbound connections from the PhoenixMQ process, or errors related to message processing that might indicate exploitation attempts.
d. Temporary WAF/IPS Rules: If PhoenixMQ exposes any HTTP-based management interfaces, deploy Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) rules to block requests containing known deserialization gadget patterns or excessively long/malformed payloads directed at PhoenixMQ endpoints.

2. PATCH AND UPDATE INFORMATION

a. Apply Vendor Patches: The primary remediation is to upgrade PhoenixMQ to a patched version immediately.
i. For PhoenixMQ 3.x installations, upgrade to version 3.2.1 or later.
ii. For PhoenixMQ 4.x installations, upgrade to version 4.0.3 or later.
b. Consult Vendor Advisories: Refer to official PhoenixMQ vendor security advisories for specific patch instructions, dependency updates, and any post-patch configuration changes required. Ensure all components of the PhoenixMQ ecosystem (brokers, clients, connectors) are updated in accordance with vendor recommendations.
c. Staging and Testing: While urgency is paramount, perform thorough testing of the patched versions in a staging environment to ensure compatibility and stability before deploying to production.

3. MITIGATION STRATEGIES

a. Restrict Deserialization: If upgrading immediately is not feasible, explore options to restrict the types of classes that can be deserialized.
i. Implement a custom ObjectInputStream (or equivalent for other languages) that uses a whitelist of allowed classes. This typically requires code modification within the MessageProcessor or an interceptor layer.
ii. Configure any available deserialization filters provided by the PhoenixMQ framework or underlying serialization libraries to explicitly deny known dangerous classes (e.g., those used in common gadget chains like Apache Commons Collections, Spring, etc.).
b. Use Secure Serialization Formats: Configure PhoenixMQ clients and MessageProcessors to use inherently safer serialization formats where possible, such as JSON, Protocol Buffers, Avro, or XML with schema validation, instead of native Java/C#/Python object serialization. This may require application code changes.
c. Least Privilege Principle: Ensure the PhoenixMQ MessageProcessor service runs under a dedicated, unprivileged user account with only the minimum necessary file system, network, and system permissions. This limits the impact of successful RCE.
d. Network Segmentation: Enforce strict network segmentation to ensure PhoenixMQ brokers and MessageProcessors are only accessible by trusted internal services and applications, completely isolated from direct internet exposure.
e. Input Validation: Implement robust input validation and sanitization on all data sent to PhoenixMQ queues by client applications, even if the data is intended to be serialized. This reduces the chance of malformed or malicious payloads reaching the deserialization engine.

4. DETECTION METHODS

a. Log Monitoring:
i. Monitor PhoenixMQ application logs for deserialization errors, unexpected class loading attempts, or stack traces indicating object creation failures that might signify an attack.
ii. Monitor system logs for unusual process execution originating from the PhoenixMQ process (e.g., shell commands, compiler invocations, unexpected network utilities).
iii. Look for outbound network connections initiated by the PhoenixMQ process to unusual or external IP addresses.
b. Network Intrusion Detection/Prevention Systems (NIDS/NIPS): Deploy and configure NIDS/NIPS to detect known deserialization attack patterns (e.g., specific byte sequences for Java/Python serialization, patterns associated with common gadget chains). Monitor for unusually large message sizes or rapid bursts of messages to PhoenixMQ ports.
c. Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR): Utilize EDR solutions on servers running PhoenixMQ to monitor for suspicious process activity, file system modifications, or unauthorized network connections originating from the PhoenixMQ

💡 AI-generated — review with a security professional before acting.View on NVD →
Post Views: 3

Site map

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions of Use
©2026 | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme