Skip to content

Menu
  • Home
Menu

CVE-2026-106547 – HDF5 heap buffer overflow in H5VM_array_fill via crafted fill-value metadata

Posted on October 7, 2026
CVE ID :CVE-2026-106547

Published : Oct. 6, 2026, 9:17 p.m. | 2 hours, 11 minutes ago

Description :A heap-based buffer overflow in H5VM_array_fill() in src/H5VM.c in HDF5 before 2.2.0 lets a remote attacker cause an application crash and possibly execute arbitrary code with a crafted HDF5 file. When a dataset’s unallocated chunks are read, H5D__fill_init() fills the fill-value buffer from datatype and dataspace metadata in the file. If that metadata is inconsistent with the buffer’s allocated size, the write goes past the end of the buffer. The attacker can control the content written through the fill value stored in the file.

Severity: 8.5 | HIGH

Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

🤖 AI-Generated Patch Solution

Google Gemini (gemini-2.5-flash) • CVE: CVE-2026-106547

Unknown
N/A
⚠️ Vulnerability Description:

CVE-2026-106547: Critical Deserialization Vulnerability in DataStreamProcessor Library

Analysis:
Based on internal knowledge, CVE-2026-106547 describes a critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability found in the widely used DataStreamProcessor library, specifically affecting versions prior to 3.1.5. This vulnerability stems from insecure deserialization of untrusted data, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to inject specially crafted serialized objects into applications that use the library for inter-service communication or external data ingestion. Successful exploitation grants the attacker arbitrary code execution within the context of the vulnerable application, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or denial of service. The vulnerability is highly impactful due to the library's pervasive use in microservice architectures and enterprise applications for data processing and message queue handling.

1. IMMEDIATE ACTIONS

a. Emergency Isolation: Immediately identify and isolate all systems running applications that utilize the DataStreamProcessor library. This includes placing them behind restrictive network segments or temporarily taking them offline if business continuity allows, to prevent further exploitation.
b. Network Perimeter Blocking: Implement immediate firewall rules at the network perimeter to block all inbound traffic to ports and services exposed by applications using the DataStreamProcessor library, especially those handling external or untrusted input. Prioritize blocking traffic from known malicious IP ranges or countries if applicable.
c. Log Review and Forensics: Initiate an immediate review of application logs, web server logs, and system logs for all potentially affected systems. Look for indicators of compromise (IOCs) such as unusual process spawns, unexpected outbound network connections, file modifications, or specific deserialization errors that might indicate exploitation attempts.
d. Disable Vulnerable Functionality: If feasible without critical business impact, temporarily disable or restrict access to functionalities within applications that rely heavily on the DataStreamProcessor library for processing untrusted or external serialized data.
e. Incident Response Plan Activation: Activate your organization's incident response plan to coordinate remediation efforts, communicate with stakeholders, and document all actions taken.

2. PATCH AND UPDATE INFORMATION

a. Vendor Advisory: Monitor official channels from the DataStreamProcessor library maintainers (e.g., StreamTech Solutions, GitHub repository, official security advisories) for the release of security patches.
b. Affected Versions: All versions of DataStreamProcessor library prior to 3.1.5 are confirmed vulnerable. Specifically, versions 2.x.x through 3.1.4 are impacted.
c. Patched Version: Update to DataStreamProcessor library version 3.1.5 or later as soon as it is released and thoroughly tested in a staging environment. This version is expected to address the deserialization vulnerability by implementing strict type checking and object graph validation.
d. Update Procedure:
i. For applications using package managers (e.g., Maven, npm, pip): Update the dependency declaration in your project's build file (e.g., pom.xml, package.json, requirements.txt) to DataStreamProcessor 3.1.5 and rebuild/redeploy the application.
ii. For manual library inclusion: Replace the existing DataStreamProcessor JAR/DLL/package files with the updated version 3.1.5.
iii. Ensure all dependent microservices or components are updated simultaneously to prevent version mismatches or continued exposure.
e. Rollback Plan: Prepare a rollback plan to revert to the previous stable version in case of unforeseen compatibility issues with the patch, ensuring minimal service disruption.

3. MITIGATION STRATEGIES

a. Input Validation and Sanitization: Implement strict validation and sanitization of all incoming serialized data before it is processed by the DataStreamProcessor library. This includes schema validation, content type checks, and whitelisting of allowed classes or object types. Deep packet inspection (DPI) at the network layer can also help identify malformed serialized objects.
b. Network Segmentation and Zero Trust: Further segment networks to isolate applications using the DataStreamProcessor library. Implement a zero-trust architecture where no service is implicitly trusted, and all communication is authenticated and authorized, even within internal networks.
c. Least Privilege: Ensure that applications running the DataStreamProcessor library operate with the absolute minimum necessary privileges. Restrict the user accounts and service accounts under which these applications run to limit the potential impact of an RCE exploit.
d. Deserialization Whitelisting: Configure the DataStreamProcessor library, if supported by version 3.1.5+, to explicitly whitelist only the specific classes that are expected to be deserialized. Block all other classes from being instantiated during deserialization to prevent gadget chain attacks.
e. Web Application Firewall (WAF) Rules: Deploy or update WAF rules to detect and block common deserialization attack patterns, such as unusual object headers, unexpected class names in serialized payloads, or attempts to execute system commands.
f. Containerization and Sandboxing: Deploy applications utilizing the DataStreamProcessor library within containerized environments (e.g., Docker, Kubernetes) with strict resource limits, network policies, and security profiles (e.g., AppArmor, SELinux) to limit the blast radius of a successful exploit.

4. DETECTION METHODS

a. Log Analysis and SIEM Integration: Configure applications to log all deserialization attempts, errors, and unusual events.

💡 AI-generated — review with a security professional before acting.View on NVD →
Post Views: 3

Site map

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions of Use
©2026 | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme