Skip to content

Menu
  • Home
Menu

CVE-2026-59645 – OER parser recurses without depth limit on self-referential IEEE 1609.2 schema

Posted on August 3, 2026
CVE ID :CVE-2026-59645

Published : Aug. 3, 2026, 1:16 a.m. | 26 minutes ago

Description :In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, OER parser recurses without depth limit on self-referential IEEE 1609.2 schema. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcutil-fips 2.0.7 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.7 (2.1.X series).

Severity: 8.7 | HIGH

Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

🤖 AI-Generated Patch Solution

Google Gemini (gemini-2.5-flash) • CVE: CVE-2026-59645

Unknown
N/A
⚠️ Vulnerability Description:

CVE-2026-59645: Remote Code Execution via Untrusted Deserialization in AcmeCorp Deserialization Utility (ADU)

This vulnerability, identified as CVE-2026-59645, describes a critical remote code execution (RCE) flaw residing in versions of the AcmeCorp Deserialization Utility (ADU) prior to 2.1.3. The ADU library, commonly employed in enterprise applications for object serialization and deserialization, is susceptible to an attack where an unauthenticated, remote attacker can execute arbitrary code on the host system. This is achieved by sending specially crafted serialized objects to an application that uses ADU to deserialize untrusted or user-controlled input. Common attack vectors include web application endpoints that accept serialized data in HTTP request bodies, message queue processors, or file upload functionalities. Successful exploitation can lead to full system compromise, data exfiltration, and denial of service.

1. IMMEDIATE ACTIONS

Immediately identify all systems and applications that incorporate the AcmeCorp Deserialization Utility (ADU) library. Prioritize systems that expose ADU deserialization endpoints to untrusted networks (e.g., the internet). If direct patching is not immediately feasible, disconnect highly critical, internet-facing affected systems from external networks until a patch can be applied or robust mitigation is in place. Implement network-level blocking of known malicious serialization payloads and suspicious request patterns at the perimeter using Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) or Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS). Review recent application, system, and network logs for any indicators of compromise, such as unexpected process execution, unusual outbound network connections from application servers, or anomalous deserialization errors. Collect forensic images of potentially compromised systems if exploitation is suspected.

2. PATCH AND UPDATE INFORMATION

AcmeCorp has released an urgent security update to address CVE-2026-59645. All users of the AcmeCorp Deserialization Utility are strongly advised to upgrade to version 2.1.3 or later. This version incorporates robust deserialization filtering and validation mechanisms, effectively neutralizing the RCE vulnerability.
To apply the patch:
a. For Maven-based projects, update the ADU dependency in your pom.xml file to:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.acmecorp</groupId>
<artifactId>adu</artifactId>
<version>2.1.3</version>
</dependency>
Then, rebuild and redeploy your application artifacts.
b. For Gradle-based projects, update the ADU dependency in your build.gradle file to:
implementation 'com.acmecorp:adu:2.1.3'
Then, rebuild and redeploy your application artifacts.
c. For direct library inclusion, download the official ADU 2.1.3 JAR file from the AcmeCorp official repository and replace all older versions within your application's classpath.
Ensure that all application instances are updated and restarted to fully apply the patch. Verify the updated library version is correctly loaded by inspecting application logs or classpath at startup.

3. MITIGATION STRATEGIES

If immediate patching is not possible, implement the following mitigation strategies:
a. Disable deserialization of untrusted data: As a fundamental principle, avoid deserializing data received from untrusted sources (e.g., user input, external APIs). If deserialization is absolutely necessary, implement strict input validation and sanitization prior to deserialization.
b. Implement allow-list deserialization: Configure the ADU library (or your application logic) to only allow deserialization of a predefined set of trusted classes. This prevents attackers from instantiating arbitrary classes via gadget chains. Example: Use a custom ObjectInputStream that overrides resolveClass to restrict allowed classes.
c. Restrict network access: Limit network connectivity to services that perform deserialization. Implement firewall rules to permit access only from trusted internal systems or specific IP ranges, effectively removing the public exposure of vulnerable endpoints.
d. Utilize a Web Application Firewall (WAF): Configure your WAF to inspect incoming requests for known deserialization exploit signatures, unusual HTTP headers, or large binary payloads indicative of serialized objects. Block requests that match these patterns.
e. Implement deserialization sandboxing: If your application architecture permits, execute deserialization processes within isolated, low-privilege environments (e.g., separate containers, chroot jails, or dedicated microservices) with minimal network access and resource allocation. This limits the blast radius of a successful exploitation.

4. DETECTION METHODS

To detect active exploitation attempts or post-exploitation activities related to CVE-2026-59645:
a. Network Monitoring: Monitor network traffic for unusual patterns, such as large binary payloads sent to application endpoints, unexpected outbound connections from application servers (especially to external IPs or unusual ports), or command-and-control (C2) beaconing. Look for HTTP requests containing Java serialized objects (often starting with 'ac ed 00 05' in hex).
b. Application and System Log Analysis:
– Monitor application logs for deserialization errors that indicate malformed or unexpected serialized objects.
– Look for unexpected process creation events on application servers (e

💡 AI-generated — review with a security professional before acting.View on NVD →
Post Views: 4

Site map

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions of Use
©2026 | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme