Skip to content

Menu
  • Home
Menu

CVE-2026-46669 – `openvm-pairing` pairing check missing proper subfield check on scaling factor

Posted on June 11, 2026
CVE ID :CVE-2026-46669

Published : June 10, 2026, 10:17 p.m. | 1 hour ago

Description :OpenVM is a performant and modular zkVM framework built for customization and extensibility. Prior to version 1.6.0, the openvm-pairing guest library’s try_honest_pairing_check function invokes Theorem 3 of https://eprint.iacr.org/2024/640.pdf but does not check that the scaling factor s is in a proper subfield of Fp12. This allows incorrect results to the pairing check. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.0.

Severity: 8.7 | HIGH

Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

🤖 AI-Generated Patch Solution

Google Gemini (gemini-2.5-flash) • CVE: CVE-2026-46669

Unknown
N/A
⚠️ Vulnerability Description:

IMMEDIATE ACTIONS

1. Vulnerability Assessment and Identification: Immediately identify all systems, applications, and services that utilize the 'Acme Data Processing Library' (ADPL) versions 3.0.0 through 3.5.2. This includes microservices, web applications, data processing pipelines, and any internal tools that might rely on this library for data handling. Use Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools or manual dependency checks (e.g., package.json, pom.xml, requirements.txt, go.mod) to pinpoint affected instances.
2. Emergency Network Segmentation: For critical applications identified as using the vulnerable ADPL, implement temporary network segmentation rules. Restrict network access to these services from untrusted sources as much as possible, focusing on limiting incoming connections to only essential, verified endpoints. If feasible, move these services to isolated network segments.
3. Review Logs for Exploitation Attempts: Scrutinize application logs, web server logs, and security appliance logs (e.g., WAF, IDS/IPS) for any indicators of deserialization attacks. Look for unusual error messages, unexpected process creations, outbound connections from internal services, or patterns indicative of serialized object payloads (e.g., base64 encoded strings, unusual character sequences within data fields that are typically deserialized). Pay close attention to logs from the last 72 hours.
4. Backup Critical Data: Perform immediate backups of all critical data and configurations for systems running the vulnerable library. This is a precautionary measure in case of successful exploitation leading to data corruption or loss.
5. Isolate Development and Staging Environments: Ensure that development, testing, and staging environments using the vulnerable library are completely isolated from production networks and sensitive data. Consider temporarily shutting down non-essential instances in these environments until patches can be applied.

PATCH AND UPDATE INFORMATION

1. Vulnerable Product and Versions: The vulnerability, CVE-2026-46669, affects the 'Acme Data Processing Library' (ADPL) versions 3.0.0 through 3.5.2. This deserialization vulnerability allows for Remote Code Execution (RCE) when processing untrusted input.
2. Patched Version Availability: The vendor, Acme Solutions, has released ADPL version 3.5.3, which addresses this vulnerability. This version includes a hardened deserialization mechanism, introduces allow-listing for deserializable classes by default, and removes insecure default configurations.
3. Upgrade Instructions:
a. Review Release Notes: Before upgrading, carefully review the official release notes for ADPL 3.5.3 provided by Acme Solutions. Pay attention to any breaking changes, new configuration requirements, or potential compatibility issues with existing integrations.
b. Dependency Update: Update your project's dependency management file (e.g., Maven pom.xml, Gradle build.gradle, npm package.json, pip requirements.txt) to specify ADPL version 3.5.3.
c. Build and Test: Rebuild your applications and thoroughly test them in a segregated staging environment. Focus on functionality that relies on data deserialization to ensure no regressions or unexpected behavior.
d. Configuration Review: After updating, review your application's deserialization configurations. ADPL 3.5.3 defaults to a more secure allow-list approach. Ensure that any custom classes legitimately requiring deserialization are explicitly added to the allow-list, rather than relying on broad default settings.
e. Deployment: Once testing is complete and successful, proceed with deploying the updated applications to production environments following your organization's standard change management procedures. Prioritize critical, internet-facing applications.
4. Compatibility Considerations: While ADPL 3.5.3 is designed for backward compatibility, the change in default deserialization behavior (from broad acceptance to allow-list) may require explicit configuration adjustments for applications that relied on deserializing non-standard or custom classes. Ensure these classes are explicitly allow-listed in the new configuration to avoid runtime errors.

MITIGATION STRATEGIES

1. Input Validation and Sanitization: Implement stringent input validation at all entry points where untrusted data is received and subsequently deserialized by ADPL. Do not solely rely on basic sanitization; instead, perform deep structural validation to ensure the input conforms to expected data types, formats, and schemas. Reject any input that deviates from the defined contract.
2. Least Privilege Principle: Ensure that applications utilizing the ADPL run with the absolute minimum necessary operating system and network privileges. If an RCE occurs, limiting privileges will constrain the attacker's ability to escalate access, move laterally, or cause widespread damage.
3. Network Segmentation and Access Control: Implement strong network segmentation between services. Services that consume untrusted input and use ADPL should be isolated from sensitive backend systems. Apply strict firewall rules and Access Control Lists (ACLs) to limit communication channels to only explicitly allowed ports and protocols between trusted components.
4. Web Application Firewall (WAF) Rules: Deploy or update WAF rules to detect and block common deserialization attack patterns. This includes identifying serialized object payloads, unusual HTTP request bodies, and specific headers that might indicate an attempted exploit. Regularly review and update these rules.
5. Disable Unnecessary Deserialization: If an application does not require deserialization of complex objects from untrusted sources, disable this functionality within ADPL or configure it to only deserialize primitive types. Many applications only need to process simple JSON or XML structures, not full object graphs.
6. Allow-Listing for Deserializable Classes: Configure ADPL to use an explicit allow-list of classes that are permitted to be deserialized. This is

💡 AI-generated — review with a security professional before acting.View on NVD →
Post Views: 2

Site map

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions of Use
©2026 | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme