Skip to content

Menu
  • Home
Menu

CVE-2019-25702 – Kados R10 GreenBee SQL Injection via id_project Parameter

Posted on April 6, 2026
CVE ID :CVE-2019-25702

Published : April 5, 2026, 9:16 p.m. | 3 hours, 21 minutes ago

Description :Kados R10 GreenBee contains an SQL injection vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate database queries by injecting SQL code through the id_project parameter. Attackers can send crafted requests with malicious SQL statements in the id_project parameter to extract sensitive database information or modify data.

Severity: 8.8 | HIGH

Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

🤖 AI-Generated Patch Solution

Google Gemini (gemini-2.5-flash) • CVE: CVE-2019-25702

Unknown
N/A
⚠️ Vulnerability Description:

1. IMMEDIATE ACTIONS

Immediately identify all systems within your environment that utilize OpenSSL. This includes web servers, mail servers, VPN gateways, application servers, and any custom applications that link against the OpenSSL library. For identified systems, determine the exact version of OpenSSL installed. Prioritize systems that expose cryptographic services to untrusted networks or process untrusted input for cryptographic operations. If immediate patching is not feasible for critical systems, consider temporarily disabling services that rely heavily on the BN_mod_sqrt function within OpenSSL, particularly if they are exposed to external input that could trigger the integer overflow. Implement enhanced monitoring for these systems, looking for unusual process termination, high CPU usage spikes, or unexpected service restarts related to OpenSSL processes. Isolate affected systems from the network if their compromise could lead to significant data loss or service disruption, until a more permanent solution can be applied.

2. PATCH AND UPDATE INFORMATION

The vulnerability CVE-2019-25702, an integer overflow in the BN_mod_sqrt function, affects OpenSSL versions 1.1.1 prior to 1.1.1d and 1.0.2 prior to 1.0.2s. To remediate this vulnerability, update all affected OpenSSL installations to a patched version.
For OpenSSL 1.1.1 series, upgrade to version 1.1.1d or later.
For OpenSSL 1.0.2 series, upgrade to version 1.0.2s or later.
The recommended method for updating is to use your operating system's package manager (e.g., apt, yum, dnf, zypper) to ensure all dependencies are correctly handled and the update is applied system-wide. For example, on Debian/Ubuntu systems, use 'sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade openssl'. On Red Hat/CentOS systems, use 'sudo yum update openssl' or 'sudo dnf update openssl'. After updating, restart all services that link against the OpenSSL library to ensure they load the new, patched version. This often includes web servers (Apache, Nginx), mail servers (Postfix, Exim), database servers (PostgreSQL, MySQL if configured for SSL), and any custom applications. Verify the OpenSSL version post-update using 'openssl version'.

3. MITIGATION STRATEGIES

If immediate patching is not possible, implement the following mitigation strategies to reduce exposure:
a. Network Segmentation and Access Control: Restrict network access to services utilizing OpenSSL to only necessary IP addresses and ports. Implement firewall rules to limit inbound connections to cryptographic services to trusted internal networks or specific whitelisted external sources where possible.
b. Input Validation: While this is a library-level vulnerability, ensure that any application-level input validation is robust, especially for parameters that might be fed into cryptographic functions. Although direct exploitation through malformed input to BN_mod_sqrt is complex, reducing the attack surface by validating all external inputs is a strong general practice.
c. Web Application Firewall (WAF): Deploy a WAF in front of web-facing applications that use OpenSSL. Configure the WAF to detect and block suspicious requests, particularly those with unusual or malformed parameters that could potentially trigger unexpected behavior in underlying cryptographic libraries, although direct WAF rules for this specific integer overflow may be difficult to craft.
d. Principle of Least Privilege: Ensure that services running OpenSSL operate with the minimum necessary privileges. This limits the potential impact if a successful exploit were to occur, preventing an attacker from easily escalating privileges or accessing sensitive data.
e. Resource Limits: Implement resource limits (e.g., CPU, memory) for processes running OpenSSL-dependent services. This can help contain the impact of a denial-of-service attack that might result from an integer overflow causing excessive resource consumption or a crash.

4. DETECTION METHODS

Implement the following methods to detect vulnerable systems and potential exploitation attempts:
a. Version Scanning: Regularly scan your environment for OpenSSL versions. Use tools like 'openssl version' on individual systems, or vulnerability scanners (e.g., Nessus, Qualys, OpenVAS) configured with up-to-date vulnerability definitions to identify instances of OpenSSL 1.1.1 prior to 1.1.1d and 1.0.2 prior to 1.0.2s.
b. Log Monitoring: Monitor system logs (syslog, journald, application-specific logs) for error messages or crash reports related to OpenSSL or cryptographic operations. Look for entries indicating unexpected termination of processes, segmentation faults, or unusual resource usage spikes immediately preceding service failures.
c. Performance Monitoring: Track CPU and

💡 AI-generated — review with a security professional before acting.View on NVD →
Post Views: 6

Site map

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions of Use
©2026 | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme